From the UK, BBC. Some sense there - the Parents are fundamentalist Christians
Baby 'should be allowed to die'
"I am quite clear that it would not be in Charlotte's best interests to die in the course of futile aggressive treatment"
Mr Justice Hedley
Charlotte was born with brain, lung and kidney damage A severely brain-damaged baby should be allowed to die if she stops breathing, a High Court judge has ruled.
The parents of 18-month-old Charlotte Wyatt have lost their legal battle to overturn a court order allowing doctors not to resuscitate her.
Darren and Debbie Wyatt, from Portsmouth, had been fighting the ruling, made in October.
But Mr Justice Hedley said that the new order was not open-ended and remained subject to review.
Doctors said Charlotte has "no feelings other than continuing pain", and earlier the court had heard how experts believed her life was "intolerable".
But the Wyatts believe Charlotte is improving.
Passing the ruling Mr Hedley said: "I am quite clear that it would not be in Charlotte's best interests to die in the course of futile aggressive treatment."
He said that if she should stop breathing all treatment, except intubation and ventilation, would be in Charlotte's best interests, "but nothing further".
Charlotte was born three months premature at St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, in October 2003, with serious brain, lung and kidney damage.
In October doctors at the hospital won the legal right not to resuscitate her.
But it now seems that Charlotte could survive for a considerable time, possibly even years, but the medical prognosis for her quality of life is bleak.
Doctors at the Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust said they believed if she stopped breathing they should not revive her as her quality of life would be so poor and be dominated by pain.
But her parents, Darren and Debbie, disagreed, saying she deserved every chance.
The case first came to the High Court last October when the judge sided with doctors.
It was brought back to the High Court again this year by the parents, but the judge has refused to overturn the original decision.
Although he said the decision should remain subject to review.
Q: Why do the doctors not want to resuscitate Charlotte?
They said there is no way her life can improve. Despite their best efforts, she is in constant pain and reviving her would not be beneficial because her quality of life would be so poor.
She also has no prospect of living beyond infancy.
She is kept in hospital and there is little prospect of her ever being allowed home at the moment, doctors have claimed.
Q: What do her parents say?
Charlotte's parents, both committed Christians, believe she is developing.
They have told the court that she can see and, to a limited extent, hear. She also smiles.
This was in contrast to her condition when the case first came to court last October when she was almost totally unresponsive.
Q: Don't parents have the final say on treatment?
No. Doctors can refuse to treat a person if they feel the treatment serves no purpose or if the quality of life is deemed to be so low that it is not in the patient's interest.
However, if the family and doctors disagree it is left to the High Court to decide.
Q: Was this the first case of its kind?
It was not the first time doctors and parents have ended up in court in these situations but previous hearings have been held in private.
Both Charlotte's parents and the Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust agreed to it being held in the open court because they felt it was in the public interest.
The cases of Luke Winston-Jones and Charlotte Wyatt case have triggered a debate about how long doctors should keep treating patients when they are seriously ill.
A High Court judge ruled that Luke, who has the rare genetic condition Edwards syndrome, should not be resuscitated should if his condition worsens.
His case follows that of baby Charlotte Wyatt. Earlier this month, a High Court judge ruled in favour of doctors who argued the premature 11-month-old girl's quality of life would be so poor that she should not be resuscitated if she stops breathing.
Her parents had appealed to Mr Justice Hedley during the two-day hearing last week that everything should be done for her as she was a "fighter".
But doctors told the court her life would be dominated by pain if she kept being treated.
It was the first time a case like this has been held in an open court.
And with medical advances being made all the time, doctors are facing the difficult question about whether it is right to stop treating desperately ill people.
Richard Nicholson, editor of the Bulletin of Medical Ethics, told BBC News Online that during the 1980s and 1990s there was almost a competition among doctors to keep premature babies alive.
Constant pain
"One of the substantial side effects of medical advancements is that we can keep the body alive almost regardless of how severely damaged it has become."
And he acknowledged the same sort of issues were cropping up in the treatment of elderly and terminally ill patients.
Dr Sarah Jarvis, a GP who has seen a number of cases where people are suffering and in constant pain, told BBC Five Live society was struggling to keep up with science.
"We probably do not know enough about the doctors intentions to know whether it is a case of euthanasia or not"
Anthony McCarthy, of the Linacre Centre
"We have to remember 10 years ago there would have been virtually no prospect of a baby born at this stage surviving.
"The problem is medical advances are galloping ahead so fast that we have reached the stage where we are keeping babies alive when perhaps 50% are going to have profound neurological difficulties."
But she insists the Charlotte case was different from the debate about euthanasia.
"Euthanasia is actively helping to end someone's life and that is illegal in this country.
"There is a big difference between that and not resuscitating."
Others remain less convinced.
Debate
Anthony McCarthy, from the Linacre Centre, a health care ethics organisation linked to the Catholic Church, said: "We probably do not know enough about the doctors intentions to know whether it is a case of euthanasia or not."
He also believes the case has opened up the debate about whether parents or doctors should have the final say on treatment.
"Parents should have the first say but parents are not always infallible.
"It is possible that parents may want to continue treatment that may be burdensome."
Doctors have the right to refuse to treat a patient if they feel it is in the person's best interests - although if the patient's family disagree the case can end up in court.
Dr Michael Wilks, of the British Medical Association's ethics committee, said the decision is taken if the treatment serves no purpose or if the quality of life is deemed to be so low that it is not beneficial.
He said: "A doctor's job is to make clinical judgements about whether treatment is appropriate or not. If it is not appropriate it should be withdrawn."
And he said while it was difficult, the public should also consider the wider implications of giving treatment.
"Every time we give unnecessary treatment we spend NHS resources and deprive someone else of these resources."
Do vegetables get medical marijuana? I think Anon is right too, the longer and incoherent the rambling, the more intelligent it obviously must be! Keep posted on the Teri Schaivo movie at www.dontyouhatepants.blogspot.com
I think Anon is right too, the longer and incoherent the rambling, the more intelligent it obviously must be!
11:38 AM
Pants indeed...
Problem is this stuff from the BBC is much better than the US Media... the US attention span at 7 seconds for a news item may have something top do with that....
I wonder who owns the US dumbed down media???? BBC is public I think...
I am a journalist in the U.S. The BBC is "public" in the sense that it is government agency. (How critical will the government ever be of itself? There is a limit.) People in England pay the equivalent of about $200 per year for a license in order to own a TV.
Also, unlike the United States, England doesn't have any Freedom of Information laws (also called "sunshine" laws). If you're not familiar with the U.S. Freedom of Information Act of 1996, it's the reason that the American public (including journalists) has open access to millions of government records — all the way from being able to check out the expense accounts of your local school superintendent or county sheriff up to the Associated Press's recent FOI request for documents detailing the testimony of hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees who are contesting their detainment.
I've lived in both England and the United States, and the BBC certainly has its strengths, but American journalism (especially newspaper journalism — TV "news" is a different bag), despite its flaws, should not be taken for granted.
"I am a journalist in the U.S. The BBC is "public" in the sense that it is government agency. (How critical will the government ever be of itself? There is a limit.) "
Totally wrong. It is an independent body with its own governing body, not answerable to the government. The BBC has openly challenged Blair on the Iraq war for instance... in a way no US media has dared.
"People in England pay the equivalent of about $200 per year for a license in order to own a TV."
Its the whole of the UK - Americans pay more than that in the 22 per cent of time they have to watch advertising.
"Also, unlike the United States, England doesn't have any Freedom of Information laws (also called "sunshine" laws). If you're not familiar with the U.S. Freedom of Information Act of 1996, it's the reason that the American public (including journalists) has open access to millions of government records — all the way from being able to check out the expense accounts of your local school superintendent or county sheriff up to the Associated Press's recent FOI request for documents detailing the testimony of hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees who are contesting their detainment."
Also totally wrong - UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy.
"I've lived in both England and the United States, and the BBC certainly has its strengths, but American journalism (especially newspaper journalism — TV "news" is a different bag), despite its flaws, should not be taken for granted."
6:33 PM
BBC news is more independant, not owned by right wingers, better written and contains mature analysis. The US just has nothing near it. CNN is different again - raw news - but network news in the is risible.
There is also ITN in the UK - commerical news of very high qulaity, andf C$ news which is critical and political - there is simply nothing to match it in the US - which is why the Terri debate has been dominated by right wing interests and can always be so.
There is the NY Times web site for Amercians who want real news - but like some fo the writers here - I agree that the BBC is unparalleled in the world.
The BBC is shitty, like most news organisations in the world. If you're looking to fly the flag of any media corporation, more fool you. The choice is between evils and lesser evils.
"Also totally wrong - UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy."
This is correct. In the UK you can get your data from Companies as well as government... there are lots of avoidance routes though.
Ya...Unity I have worked as a journalist in the UK too -
The main thing is that the BBC was able to attacking the government relentlessly about Iraq and the misleading tales told by government - Since then Blair has been trying to destroy BBC's independence and independent funding. It is good public service broadcasting.
Blair is a neo con.... like Bush. Rabid Christian who got down on his knees with GB to pray for guidance about Iraq!!! Give me a break
Fist said... "BBC's not shitty, I rely on it a lot"
As I said before, more fool you.
8:52 AM
Out of line Fist... BBC tries like nothing else. Through wars and peace it has kept independence... who do you think IS worth listening to if they aren't? You???
" Neoconservatives argued that America has to re-discover its "military strength and moral clarity" and needed to "challenge regimes hostile to our interest and values".
They believe that "American leadership is good for America and good for the world and in that order"
"What is perhaps most remarkable is how early Mr Bush realised the importance of reaching out to Christian conservatives."
"The Shiavo case became important politically because President Bush appealed to his ultra conservative religious base in their attempt to keep Mrs Schiavo alive. "What the United States Congress and what the president of the United States said is, 'This is not right,'"
"You gotta understand, I want to be president, I want to lead,"
but....
At the recent Camp David summit between Tony Blair and President Bush, the news conference was packed and the overflow press corps listened from a big room, British and Europeans separated from their American colleagues by a thin partition.
The Americans shuffled with outraged incomprehension as the Brits howled with laughter at President Bush's verbal infelicities.
Oh and about world progress from a UN conference, under dumb George
The 150-page Beijing declaration stated that women have the right to "decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their sexuality.
The US position at the current meeting reflects President George W Bush's "conservative right" stance against abortion. However, the UN conference's action plan did call for governments not to punish women who have undergone abortions."
"Bush has done his best to ignore and sabotage the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which he refuses to sign. Most Western nations argue the protocal as being vital to the future wellbeing of the planet"
"On Iraq, President Bush has found himself dangerously isolated, save for a few loyal allies.
The belief that the US can go it alone has been shaken by events after the invasion."
"And the visit has an important domestic by-product. Ordinary Americans will have been reassured by their president's return to the world stage. No country likes being hated by the rest of the world."
The officers were caught on camera as they handcuffed the girl A lawyer has threatened to sue police officers who handcuffed an allegedly uncontrollable five-year-old after she acted up at a Florida kindergarten.
You guys serious - this is Bush land as well??? You want to kill everything, posion everything, buy everything.... leaders of the free world
"New claims have surfaced alleging military doctors were asked to participate in acts of torture and humiliation during interrogations at the now notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. The persons before them were both patients and enemies.
One Iraqi woman who, according to Amnesty International, was tortured in Abu Ghraib, said prisoners were often unconscious after interrogation sessions. Two doctors, usually one American and one Iraqi, then examined the prisoners.
On one occasion, it's claimed, a doctor was ordered to insert an intravenous catheter into the corpse of a prisoner killed under interrogation to disguise the cause and time of death.
Yeaaaa George, whoaaa, there's a boy. Defending freedom. So this is what you do to our reputation - this will be remembered for centuries in the Mid East
Terri had difficulty speaking, yes.. Most of us would 'not want to live that way'... until we get to that state and realize that there is still quality of life and opportunities to love and be loved. That's what it's really all about. She was conscious and feeling, and wanted to stay alive. - See the FORBIDDEN VIDEO that the Managed Media censored from your view: http://4lifeshaperite.com/rumbles/Conversations_with_Terri.html
She was conscious and in need of therapy, and her mother's comfort. Yet they killed her.
As we're into quotes, get this about our glorious leader.
"Private discussions held by George W Bush before he became president suggest he used marijuana, but would not admit it for fear of setting a bad example. Mr Bush said that his refusal to answer questions about illegal drugs might cost him the 2000 election.
The conversations were secretly taped by a former aide to Mr Bush's father who has now released part of them."
Mr Bush has spoken frequently about a drink problem in his youth, which ended with an apparent religious awakening at the age of 40, but he has never admitted taking illegal drugs.
On the tape, however, the future president discusses his refusal to answer questions about whether he took marijuana. (and cocaine)
"I wouldn't answer the marijuana question," he says.
"You know why? 'Cause I don't want some little kid doing what I tried."
Oh Lord George, you are such a genius! We all model ourselves on you, didn't you know that...
"In response to a remark by Mr Wead that the future president had publicly denied using cocaine, he said, quoted by the New York Times: "I haven't denied anything."
He said that he would continue to refuse to comment on allegations of drug use.
"I am just not going to answer those questions," he said. "And it might cost me the election."
She was conscious and in need of therapy, and her mother's comfort. Yet they killed her.
7:21 PM
Oh get a life Dee - you must be vegetative to beleive this trash... the best doctors in the land, all the judges, all the experts, and everyone except Christain fundos said she was totally braindead....
NO consciousness, NO thought, NO feeling, NO hope of recovery (after more than 15 years in the same state - with no improvement at all - AT ALL)
How do you think this trash shows all of them to be wrong????
wow. how am i supposed to write a persuasive essay and do a speach on it tomorrow afterschool on euthanasia, and use you as an example if i cant find even two stories that match one another on how things went down for you. this is frickin stupid. i hate school.
Anonymous said... wow. how am i supposed to write a persuasive essay and do a speach on it tomorrow afterschool on euthanasia, and use you as an example if i cant find even two stories that match one another on how things went down for you. this is frickin stupid. i hate school.
Anonymous said... [The BBC] is an independent body with its own governing body, not answerable to the government. The BBC has openly challenged Blair on the Iraq war for instance... in a way no US media has dared.
I will agree that much of the major, mainstream U.S. media has been shamefully soft on the Bush administration — though I hesitate to generalize, since any body of media has many layers. If you feel that no U.S. media has raised challenges to the Bush administration, perhaps you simply haven’t had access to it. Or perhaps you're only watching television.
Anonymous said... UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy.
Legal access to information in the United States is far more extensive than in the U.K. This is due to the First Amendment as well as the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. British libel laws and the British Official Secrets Act, in fact, may inhibit free access to information. I’m not as familiar with your Data Protection Act, but from a cursory overview just now it appears to me that the act also may inhibit, rather than support, access to information. Good journalism certainly can (and does) happen in both environments, but U.S. law is significantly more supportive of someone who is doing investigative journalism. There is simply no question about it.
Anonymous said... BBC news is more independant, not owned by right wingers, better written and contains mature analysis. The US just has nothing near it. CNN is different again - raw news - but network news in the is risible.
I won’t even begin to defend or discuss television “news” of any kind — American or otherwise. Television news coverage is nearly always cursory and mostly useless. The United States has some world-class print journalism outlets. In Britain, there certainly is a difference between broadsheet newspapers and tabloids.
Anonymous said... There is also ITN in the UK - commerical news of very high qulaity, andf C$ news which is critical and political - there is simply nothing to match it in the US - which is why the Terri debate has been dominated by right wing interests and can always be so.
The Terri Schiavo case and the congressional action surrounding it actually generated quite an outrage among both Democrats and Republicans in the American public. This absolutely was covered by American newspapers. If your impression is otherwise, or if you're relying only on TV "news," I’d be suspicious of your sources.
1. much of the major, mainstream U.S. media has been shamefully soft on the Bush administration
If you feel that no U.S. media has raised challenges to the Bush administration, perhaps you simply haven’t had access to it. Or perhaps you're only watching television.
Yes but what is the coverage of those two media? Only a small critical voice in the print media has been heard - read by a small minority of the US.
"Legal access to information in the United States is far more extensive than in the U.K. This is due to the First Amendment as well as the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.
Not so. This from the person who didn't know there was an FOI Act in the UK?
British libel laws and the British Official Secrets Act, in fact, may inhibit free access to information.
Nonsense. The Offical Secrets Act is mirrored in the US and elsewhere - national interest etc. Libel Laws have no influence at all on disclosure, but act to ensure that allegations are at least substantial.
"I’m not as familiar with your Data Protection Act, but from a cursory overview just now it appears to me that the act also may inhibit, rather than support, access to information."
On what grounds. That's just nonsence. In principal companies are obliged to disclose and correcr - there is nothing like that in the US. The problem has been that companies have found ways of evading the Law.... especially US ones.
"Good journalism certainly can (and does) happen in both environments, but U.S. law is significantly more supportive of someone who is doing investigative journalism. There is simply no question about it."
That is just utter nationalistic rubbish! Martin Bashire who raised serious question about Michael Jackson for instance is British and made his program under UK jurisdiction.
"I won’t even begin to defend or discuss television “news” of any kind — American or otherwise. Television news coverage is nearly always cursory and mostly useless."
Not the BBC, C4 or ITN in the UK - try watching them.
"The United States has some world-class print journalism outlets...."
and a lot more total junk.
"In Britain, there certainly is a difference between broadsheet newspapers and tabloids."
errr. yes?
"The Terri Schiavo case and the congressional action surrounding it actually generated quite an outrage among both Democrats and Republicans in the American public. This absolutely was covered by American newspapers. If your impression is otherwise, or if you're relying only on TV "news," I’d be suspicious of your sources."
Well - it was simply better covered elsewhere - bit in print and on TV...
Terri Shiavo should still be alive. God decreed that Man has the right to life. Ever read the Bible? I have faith that God will descend upon us with his wrath and destroy all you heretics. God is Great. He is the Way! Join him or suffer. God is mercifull, but up to a point. When Jesus hung prostrated on the cross, God said, "No way son, you got yourself into this one. Shed your sorrow like pardons for sin upon Man, then shall the nails jerk free." Like Jesus, Terri was nailed to a bed, coaxed into false slumber by the sins of nonbelievers. Her death is the making of your doom. While she was fated to suffer silently, your cries of agony will echo through the neverending chambers of Hell. My son's pardon extends so far. To sever the umbilicus to life that kept Terri living is to forfeit his mercy. My mercy mirrors my wrath. May Satan have mercy on your soul.
If this was 30 years ago the Christians would have wanted Terri off the life support. That goes to show you how worthless religion is, it's not real, it's myth believed by idiots. Sorry to break to to you.
Yea, gods are for people wo can't accept the real world around them. Sure there is something bigger out there we can't understand, but I assure you it isn't a supreme father figure in the sky shaking his finger at all the little creations that stray from his list of 10 things you aren't supposed to do. haha the bible, what a crock.
If Religion was real, it would be universal across the entire world, this is obviously not the case. The existance of so many religions nullifies the existance of all of them. Religion isn't real kids, your parents lied to you, grow up.
"Religion isn't real kids, your parents lied to you, grow up."
"Yea, gods are for people wo can't accept the real world around them. Sure there is something bigger out there we can't understand,"
"dod is a crutch, and similar to any addictive substance, yea it's all in your head."
These statement must be true. Any religion that beleive it is the only way towahtever - salvation, in this case has to be wron g, and used by the unfit to make themselves feel better.
I think there are more unitive spiritualities rather than religions - that require personal exploration and experience - not just judgement of "lesser religions'' and people that follow them.
Best Christians I ever came across - have been Budhhists.... no judging god in a white robe there... no ranting ministers, sin or other bullshit merchants like George Bush
"Terri Shiavo should still be alive. God decreed that Man has the right to life. Ever read the Bible?"
Yes, did you??
I have faith that God will descend upon us with his wrath and destroy all you heretics. God is Great. He is the Way! Join him or suffer. God is mercifull, but up to a point."
I think he will burn you first, moron.
"When Jesus hung prostrated on the cross, God said, "No way son, you got yourself into this one. Shed your sorrow like pardons for sin upon Man, then shall the nails jerk free."
You think that's the bible, right? Oooooo dearrrr......pardon me it's difficult to type laughing this hard....
" Like Jesus, Terri was nailed to a bed, coaxed into false slumber by the sins of nonbelievers. Her death is the making of your doom. While she was fated to suffer silently, your cries of agony will echo through the neverending chambers of Hell."
Which testament is that you read son, (or I suspect, bitch.....)????
"My son's pardon extends so far. To sever the umbilicus to life that kept Terri living is to forfeit his mercy. My mercy mirrors my wrath. May Satan have mercy on your soul."
Holy Cow, you are a satanist....bad bad girl. You are really in the shit no....
Fuckin hilarious! alright here's meh 2 cents. USA kicks ass and is doing just fine. pull the plug!
That's less that one cent.... US is the most fucked place in the world - most gun crime, most rapes, most murders, biggest division between rich and poor in G8, most therapists, most child abuse, most infant murders, most polluting, biggest effect on global warming, most wars, worst TV (except Simpsons) least ability to learn about the world, least ability to learn foreign languages, most support for illegal wars (since end of WW2), most illiteracy in G8, poorest public health care in G8, most religous conservatives, least beleive in evolution, and....the two most stupid leaders in world history - Ray Gun, and Thick George
SINCE the war was "won" (then why are Americans still dying there)
Iraqi civilian deaths put at 100,000
Tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed in violence since the US-led invasion last year, according to public health experts who estimate there were 100,000 "excess deaths" in 18 months.
The US-based researchers found that the risk of death from violence in the period after the invasion was 58 times higher than before the war.
The rise in the death rate was mainly due to violence and much of it was caused by US air strikes on towns and cities, they said.
"Making conservative assumptions, we think that about 100,000 excess deaths or more have happened since the 2003 invasion of Iraq," said Les Roberts of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in a report published online by The Lancet medical journal.
Anyone who believes someone in Terri Shiavo's condition should be alive has flawed logic. I consider you people dangerous, you believe your insane voice counts which in fact you should either shut up or be shot.
Anonymous said... Anyone who believes someone in Terri Shiavo's condition should be alive has flawed logic. I consider you people dangerous, you believe your insane voice counts which in fact you should either shut up or be shot.
8:04 AM
Yup... problem is most people here think she should have been alowed to die with dignity (apart from afew crazies...)
You are logically flawed, you do not SEE it, you do not see how they are destroying your country. How does this indicate a problem with myself? You are the one with the problem.
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
You're eerily on the mark there, are you taunting me Jew? I know how to reverse this pollution, people will gain wind of what you've done when I share it with the world and they will want blood.
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
You're eerily on the mark there, are you taunting me Jew? I know how to reverse this pollution, people will gain wind of what you've done when I share it with the world and they will want blood.
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
Actually looser, that is a famous quote from a film.... Dr Strangelove. It's above a mad bastard who thinks communists have polluted his bodily fluids and tries to annhilate the world...!!!
Your are a sandwich or two short of picnic..
I also thing you are having a feud here with a non existant fantasy Jew - anonymous can mean many people - get the idea??!
Better views? You mean the average views that have turned this planet into the sewer that it is? No thanks, i'll stick to my own superior beliefs and ultimately force them on others.
Oh you're going to 'get me'? Hahaha. I always laugh at gangsters who try to intimidate others over the internet with rl threats. I'd speak all of this to someone's face, I fear nothing.
National Socialism will come back, it's only a matter of time before people get tired of the Jews again. They may be more discrete in their mischief but they aren't fooling everyone.
Hey Unity, About Amarican mainstream media --- "Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying ... is considered career suicide." -- Carl Cameron, as quoted in The Spies Who Came In From The Art Sale
"While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk." -- Unnamed reporter as quoted in American Media Censorship and Israel
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." -- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. --- read more at www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html
These phrases, "hate speech" and "anti-Semite", are well-worn devices to shut up a critic of Israel without having to answer the criticisms. Indeed they have been used so much that they have become red warning flags that the person using those phrases has something to hide and needs to shut down the discussion by any means possible. By screaming "hate speech" or "anti-Semite", Israel's supporters hope to shut down the debate without actually examining the issues involved. The truth is "hate speech" only to those who have something to hide www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html MORE PEOPLE READ www.whatreallyhappened.com/ THAN READ NEWSWEEK.COM OR the US Government's CitizenCorp! http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=640&h=480&r=1y&y=r&u=whatreallyhappened.com/&u= http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379&h=216&r=6m&y=r&u=newsweek.com/&u=
"No - Nazism will return and gloriously cleanse the world of impurity sickness and racial error. We will kill all of the untermensch..." and that mean you.... blog reading vermin.
"I will be the new super leader of the master race, the arians - and from this blog comments section, march to glory with the seried legions of the New Blog Order".
"I am superior in mind body and thought to all of you! I write more comments on this blog than any other human in existance. You are all inferior to me.
I have access to the real truth web sites which you, the normal lesser people cannot find or assimilate.
"Others must adhere to my beliefs, not the other way around."
Resistance is useless! The blog National Socalist Hoard will achieve world dominance in 5 months from the date of this post, starting by taking over the comments columns of this blog and any others where anyone dares to oppose the new Reich.... and irrespective of the ignorance of the purpose of that blog or the inferiority of the readers of that blog.
Then I will come out of my bedroom and see if Mommy has made the warm milk.
Nazi chasers will also hunt modern-day monsters By Peter Eisler, USA TODAY WASHINGTON — The Justice Department's Nazi hunters, still busy as ever, are about to get a new class of bad guys to chase. The intelligence overhaul law signed Dec. 17 by President Bush includes a provision that directs the department's Office of Special Investigations (OSI) to root out all manner of war criminals and human rights abusers who try to settle in the USA.
OYE VEY ! lol, Maury now has to resort to sarcasm. READERS check out www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html and decide for yourself. btw, www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html is not an opnion site, it uses all your much valued Israeli controlled mainstream medias and government reports as resources with links to the orginals stories as posted on the mainstream media sites. So READERS, GET THE FACTS www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html
or this - surely you can't be a Nazi if some of them are jews!
Israeli soldier arrested for neo-Nazi ties Jamie Cortazzo at 3:23 PM
[JURIST] A Russian immigrant turned Israeli soldier was arrested in Israel for ties to neo-Nazi groups Thursday just as Israel was marking Holocaust Remambrance Day [bakgrounder] on the 60th anniversary of Nazi Germany's defeat. The soldier had been arrested on drug charges, but under interrogation told police he was a Nazi, which led to the discovery of correspondence with neo-Nazi groups on the soldier's computer and a swastika tattoo on his arm. Israel was founded as a safe haven for Jews after World War II and has accepted a multitude of Russian Jewish immigrants.
French neo-Nazis formed an alliance with extremist Jewish groups on the Internet to publish a torrent of hate messages directed against Arabs and Muslims, according to a report by a leading anti-racist group. The report said 26 websites, traced to right-wing and Jewish extremists groups in France, operated from the same server in the United States between 1999 and March this year.
Members of the groups also shared advice on how to send messages without leaving electronic trails.
JRomances is dedicated to bringing Jewish friends and singles together by offering valuable services to all of our Jewish singles and friends in your city and around the world.
Reading through your posts here - and there are many - you are an uneducated, misguided person of little merit, and great personal insecurity.
You have won no arguements, made no worthy points and merely embarassed yourself with historical inaccuracy, ranting and offensivenes. Because you refuse to listen to some quite sensible things that have been written to you, means only that - that you are too confused to listen.
You claim, "a much higher level intelligence than any one of you, you LOSE."
These are the words of a schizophrenic. Pure and simple.
That you don't realise it, is really only tour problem. From what I can see everyone else has quite clearly established a proper opinion of you and your material
"I'm now accused of being Jewish? This is comical!"
Do yo know - I think it may just be true! You looser!
"It's funny you would assign a Jewish identity to me when you seem to care so much about the Jews. The Jews did the same to Adolf Hitler, spreading false propoganda that he had Jewish roots, absolutely pathetic."
Oh yea - poor old Hitler, so misunderstood.
"Try again you mental defects, like many before you, you are unable to win an argument against me."
Now that really is funny.... loooooooser !!
"This 'Nazi lunatic' has thus proven to hold a much higher level intelligence than any one of you, you LOSE."
Jesus wept! You are a total moron! Brainless, stupid, misled, misguded, deluded....Nazi.
What is it exactly you have won???? What great goad have you achieved!!!!
It is evident from what you write that you are incapable of winning an argument against me. You're usage of the word 'LOOOSER' just further proves my point. I stand on a higher ground than the rest of you worthless sheep, this is a fact, tossing cheap, juvenile posts against me doesn't change this fact. I continue to win arguments against those that have been brainwashed by the Jew, I have experienced more of their heinous acts than anyone here can claim. Ignorance is a poison, drop it or perish.
of all the people on the internet, i have met only few who can take hits, and deliver with a vengence... steak, kudos to u man, bcause if anyone pins u down, he or she has to be damn good.
streak, keep up that funny ass comments. fun to read
Nazi isn't even a real term, it's a word the enemies of National Socialism use. I was not born in Germany and thus do not know German so I don't know what your point is. You have no grounds by which you can claim that I am not a National Socialist.
Anonymous said... of all the people on the internet, i have met only few who can take hits, and deliver with a vengence... steak, kudos to u man, bcause if anyone pins u down, he or she has to be damn good.
streak, keep up that funny ass comments. fun to read
9:29 PM
The guy is toooo sick to notice how out on a limb he is...
Nazi isn't even a real term, it's a word the enemies of National Socialism use."
Bollocks - you don't even know the origins of that word... ???
"I was not born in Germany and thus do not know German so I don't know what your point is."
His/her point is that you are a fraud. A saddo sitting in his bedroom making up crap on your own - it's why you have nothing to say. It's just like masturbation, you do it on your own - and gets you a bit of attention - even if that is just people laughing at you.... that's real sad.
"You have no grounds by which you can claim that I am not a National Socialist.
I think you are wrong...
you have been exposed - and cleverly. You know nothing about it... all you do is make a few stupid comments any 14 year old could make.
You guys are using the same old juvenile rebuttals I am used to from many previous sites, absolutely pathetic. You aren't going to win this argument no matter how hard you try, it's sad that you've even sunk low enough to claim I am Jewish and not a Nazi, this is absolutely hilarious to me. You're just upset that someone is out there that isn't going to take the shit of the world with open arms, are you one of those Jewish pigs who have ruined this country? Wouldn't suprise me in the least bit. Change your attitudes or perish.
yall are all so screwd up...FIST that is rude..im doin a report over teri for skool if u knew wat she went through u wouldnt be makin stupied remarks u just may get wat u want
You loser, how on earth could you be so insensitive. She was a human being just like you and I, and had the right to live just like the rest of us. Putting words in the mouths of the dead is just wrong... She was only put to death because she was suffering and not just because it was her choice... At least she is not suffering anymore... How would you like it if you were in that condition and someone had the idea to do this to you. Think on that!
well yea - she out of harms way -especially those creeps of parent so fhers and all the appalling fundo Christians who thought they would stick thier oar into her life...
ISRAILI spec forces are like... dude!!!! they lopped almost the whole barrel off of an M16 varient, causing lack of pressure biuld up to cycle the next round which causes jamming, massive muzzel flash and singed eyebrows (for non gun-nuts, that means they cut up a rifle, just so they could fit 40 of them in the boot of a mini and shoot their thumbs off by accident)
ooh I saw something about this on the news, but I'd better not get too involved with anything to do with ethics or oppinion because theres a chance I'l make an arse of myself, although I may have already.
but thats not the point, the point is, any israili spec forces operative, however incorrectly spelt his title is or how many of his thumbs he has shot off, can still take down any of the immoral muppets here, using only his eyebrows.
Where's Wally?? Is he colour enhanced, where did they put his red and white jumper, i want one. I want a chocolate covered pencil case so that i can fly to the moon and see my dad with the dolphins, while scratching a telephone pole against a blackboard.
Four and Twenty years ago I come into this life, Son of a woman And a man who lived in strife. He was tired of being poor But he wasn't into selling door to door And he worked like a devil to be more.
A different kind of poverty now upsets me so Night after sleepless night I walk the floor and want to know Why am I so alone? Where is my woman, can I bring her home? Have I driven her away? Is she gone?
Morning comes the sunrise, And I'm driven to my bed I see that it is empty And there's devils in my head. I embrace the many colored beast. I grow weary of the torment Can there be no peace? And I find myself just wishing that my life would simply cease.
9/11 WAS A HOAX AND BUSH WAS BEHIND IT. HOW CAN BUSH CARE SO MUCH ABOUT TERRI SCHIAVO WHEN HE KILLED 3000 PEOPLE ON 9/11????
BUSH CAUSED 9/11 TO HIGHTEN HIS POPULARITY AND TO DESTROY ALL ARAB/MUSLIM NATIONS THAT DON'T LIKE ISRAEL. HE WANTS JESUS TO RETURN TO EARTH AND THAT'S WHY HE WANTS TO TAKE OVER AND SET UP ISRAELI-FRIENDLY PUPPETT GOVERNMENTS IN THESE NATIONS. THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS IT:
Sean Hannity talked about two people facing death in the last few years. One was going to be a drain on society, the other most likely would give a great deal back to the greater good. Sean Hannity spared no energy to save one of them, and lobbied hard for the death of the other.
Ugh ugh All you Terri fans throw your hands up What?! Cherry licker Nipple sucker Schlong licker
I used to know a bitch named Terri Schiavo She used to love chicken wings and thai ropes Now she's confined to a bed And her eyes are always in the back of her head I know a guy named Reggie who's compared her to a veggie Her ass is so big she can't pull out her own wedgie The lack of dimples makes you look kind of edgy The way she bends her neck back, man, she looks sexy
Get on your knees bitch Suck my dick If you prefer you can call it an oversized clit Terri suck my balls Terri suck my balls But she drools everywhere And choke on a pubic hair Now it's time sing about little -what? Dig it -- I mean nip
For more go to: www.myspace.com/terriandtheschiavos1
179 Comments:
Jeez, I wish I was a vegetable in heaven. I'm at my desk, worrying about work.
haha. great!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/4466855.stm
From the UK, BBC. Some sense there - the Parents are fundamentalist Christians
Baby 'should be allowed to die'
"I am quite clear that it would not be in Charlotte's best interests to die in the course of futile aggressive treatment"
Mr Justice Hedley
Charlotte was born with brain, lung and kidney damage
A severely brain-damaged baby should be allowed to die if she stops breathing, a High Court judge has ruled.
The parents of 18-month-old Charlotte Wyatt have lost their legal battle to overturn a court order allowing doctors not to resuscitate her.
Darren and Debbie Wyatt, from Portsmouth, had been fighting the ruling, made in October.
But Mr Justice Hedley said that the new order was not open-ended and remained subject to review.
Doctors said Charlotte has "no feelings other than continuing pain", and earlier the court had heard how experts believed her life was "intolerable".
But the Wyatts believe Charlotte is improving.
Passing the ruling Mr Hedley said: "I am quite clear that it would not be in Charlotte's best interests to die in the course of futile aggressive treatment."
He said that if she should stop breathing all treatment, except intubation and ventilation, would be in Charlotte's best interests, "but nothing further".
Charlotte was born three months premature at St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, in October 2003, with serious brain, lung and kidney damage.
In October doctors at the hospital won the legal right not to resuscitate her.
But it now seems that Charlotte could survive for a considerable time, possibly even years, but the medical prognosis for her quality of life is bleak.
Q: What was the case about?
Doctors at the Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust said they believed if she stopped breathing they should not revive her as her quality of life would be so poor and be dominated by pain.
But her parents, Darren and Debbie, disagreed, saying she deserved every chance.
The case first came to the High Court last October when the judge sided with doctors.
It was brought back to the High Court again this year by the parents, but the judge has refused to overturn the original decision.
Although he said the decision should remain subject to review.
Q: Why do the doctors not want to resuscitate Charlotte?
They said there is no way her life can improve. Despite their best efforts, she is in constant pain and reviving her would not be beneficial because her quality of life would be so poor.
She also has no prospect of living beyond infancy.
She is kept in hospital and there is little prospect of her ever being allowed home at the moment, doctors have claimed.
Q: What do her parents say?
Charlotte's parents, both committed Christians, believe she is developing.
They have told the court that she can see and, to a limited extent, hear. She also smiles.
This was in contrast to her condition when the case first came to court last October when she was almost totally unresponsive.
Q: Don't parents have the final say on treatment?
No. Doctors can refuse to treat a person if they feel the treatment serves no purpose or if the quality of life is deemed to be so low that it is not in the patient's interest.
However, if the family and doctors disagree it is left to the High Court to decide.
Q: Was this the first case of its kind?
It was not the first time doctors and parents have ended up in court in these situations but previous hearings have been held in private.
Both Charlotte's parents and the Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust agreed to it being held in the open court because they felt it was in the public interest.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3722776.stm
More....
The cases of Luke Winston-Jones and Charlotte Wyatt case have triggered a debate about how long doctors should keep treating patients when they are seriously ill.
A High Court judge ruled that Luke, who has the rare genetic condition Edwards syndrome, should not be resuscitated should if his condition worsens.
His case follows that of baby Charlotte Wyatt. Earlier this month, a High Court judge ruled in favour of doctors who argued the premature 11-month-old girl's quality of life would be so poor that she should not be resuscitated if she stops breathing.
Her parents had appealed to Mr Justice Hedley during the two-day hearing last week that everything should be done for her as she was a "fighter".
But doctors told the court her life would be dominated by pain if she kept being treated.
It was the first time a case like this has been held in an open court.
And with medical advances being made all the time, doctors are facing the difficult question about whether it is right to stop treating desperately ill people.
Richard Nicholson, editor of the Bulletin of Medical Ethics, told BBC News Online that during the 1980s and 1990s there was almost a competition among doctors to keep premature babies alive.
Constant pain
"One of the substantial side effects of medical advancements is that we can keep the body alive almost regardless of how severely damaged it has become."
And he acknowledged the same sort of issues were cropping up in the treatment of elderly and terminally ill patients.
Dr Sarah Jarvis, a GP who has seen a number of cases where people are suffering and in constant pain, told BBC Five Live society was struggling to keep up with science.
"We probably do not know enough about the doctors intentions to know whether it is a case of euthanasia or not"
Anthony McCarthy, of the Linacre Centre
"We have to remember 10 years ago there would have been virtually no prospect of a baby born at this stage surviving.
"The problem is medical advances are galloping ahead so fast that we have reached the stage where we are keeping babies alive when perhaps 50% are going to have profound neurological difficulties."
But she insists the Charlotte case was different from the debate about euthanasia.
"Euthanasia is actively helping to end someone's life and that is illegal in this country.
"There is a big difference between that and not resuscitating."
Others remain less convinced.
Debate
Anthony McCarthy, from the Linacre Centre, a health care ethics organisation linked to the Catholic Church, said: "We probably do not know enough about the doctors intentions to know whether it is a case of euthanasia or not."
He also believes the case has opened up the debate about whether parents or doctors should have the final say on treatment.
"Parents should have the first say but parents are not always infallible.
"It is possible that parents may want to continue treatment that may be burdensome."
Doctors have the right to refuse to treat a patient if they feel it is in the person's best interests - although if the patient's family disagree the case can end up in court.
Dr Michael Wilks, of the British Medical Association's ethics committee, said the decision is taken if the treatment serves no purpose or if the quality of life is deemed to be so low that it is not beneficial.
He said: "A doctor's job is to make clinical judgements about whether treatment is appropriate or not. If it is not appropriate it should be withdrawn."
And he said while it was difficult, the public should also consider the wider implications of giving treatment.
"Every time we give unnecessary treatment we spend NHS resources and deprive someone else of these resources."
Has no-one here heard of google?
Or thought of the advantages linking has over extensive quoting?
I bet the old bag doesn't have these problems in heaven.
Yes, fist - sorry too much. Got carried away with the maturity of the debate compare to US media!!!
Anon.
Do vegetables get medical marijuana? I think Anon is right too, the longer and incoherent the rambling, the more intelligent it obviously must be!
Keep posted on the Teri Schaivo movie at www.dontyouhatepants.blogspot.com
It's a poor parent who allows his/her child to suffer needlessly.
WOOO TERRI! YOU GOT ANY GONJA FOR ME BABES?!
YOU SAVED MY LIFE! BECAUSE OF YOU I NOW CARRY A FEEDING TUBE WHEREVER I GO JUST INCASE SOMEONE TAKES MY OTHER ONE! <3
i love you forever xoxox
GOD BLESS
Don't bogart the weed Teri, oh wait... it's heaven, weed is unlimited...
Anonymous said...
I think Anon is right too, the longer and incoherent the rambling, the more intelligent it obviously must be!
11:38 AM
Pants indeed...
Problem is this stuff from the BBC is much better than the US Media... the US attention span at 7 seconds for a news item may have something top do with that....
I wonder who owns the US dumbed down media???? BBC is public I think...
Most US media belongs to Georges guys....
Did Pants say those quotes were incoherent.... no, they are certainly not that - in fact the whole site is very very good from what I can see...
Tony Blair for president....
Fist said...
Jeez, I wish I was a vegetable in heaven. I'm at my desk, worrying about work.
1:47 AM
Hey, time to get some sleep???? It can always wait to tomorrow.... as Terri found out you have to make the best of life if you can....
Screw NBC and FOX.... BBC looks great for UK and international news , but no good for US
I am a journalist in the U.S. The BBC is "public" in the sense that it is government agency. (How critical will the government ever be of itself? There is a limit.) People in England pay the equivalent of about $200 per year for a license in order to own a TV.
Also, unlike the United States, England doesn't have any Freedom of Information laws (also called "sunshine" laws). If you're not familiar with the U.S. Freedom of Information Act of 1996, it's the reason that the American public (including journalists) has open access to millions of government records — all the way from being able to check out the expense accounts of your local school superintendent or county sheriff up to the Associated Press's recent FOI request for documents detailing the testimony of hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees who are contesting their detainment.
I've lived in both England and the United States, and the BBC certainly has its strengths, but American journalism (especially newspaper journalism — TV "news" is a different bag), despite its flaws, should not be taken for granted.
anonymous said...
I wonder who owns the US dumbed down media????
If you're interested in who owns what in the U.S. media, check out this link.
I won a sweet ass bong yesterday at a 420 raffel. Wish you could see it. Add me to your blog list.
grinchliketheft.blogspot.com
The Jellybean
Unity said...
"I am a journalist in the U.S. The BBC is "public" in the sense that it is government agency. (How critical will the government ever be of itself? There is a limit.) "
Totally wrong. It is an independent body with its own governing body, not answerable to the government. The BBC has openly challenged Blair on the Iraq war for instance... in a way no US media has dared.
"People in England pay the equivalent of about $200 per year for a license in order to own a TV."
Its the whole of the UK - Americans pay more than that in the 22 per cent of time they have to watch advertising.
"Also, unlike the United States, England doesn't have any Freedom of Information laws (also called "sunshine" laws). If you're not familiar with the U.S. Freedom of Information Act of 1996, it's the reason that the American public (including journalists) has open access to millions of government records — all the way from being able to check out the expense accounts of your local school superintendent or county sheriff up to the Associated Press's recent FOI request for documents detailing the testimony of hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees who are contesting their detainment."
Also totally wrong - UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy.
"I've lived in both England and the United States, and the BBC certainly has its strengths, but American journalism (especially newspaper journalism — TV "news" is a different bag), despite its flaws, should not be taken for granted."
6:33 PM
BBC news is more independant, not owned by right wingers, better written and contains mature analysis. The US just has nothing near it. CNN is different again - raw news - but network news in the is risible.
There is also ITN in the UK - commerical news of very high qulaity, andf C$ news which is critical and political - there is simply nothing to match it in the US - which is why the Terri debate has been dominated by right wing interests and can always be so.
There is the NY Times web site for Amercians who want real news - but like some fo the writers here - I agree that the BBC is unparalleled in the world.
The BBC is shitty, like most news organisations in the world. If you're looking to fly the flag of any media corporation, more fool you. The choice is between evils and lesser evils.
BBC's not shitty, I rely on it a lot - especially for Iraq - patriotism does stink though? Especially the modern American version????
Anon sais
"Also totally wrong - UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy."
This is correct. In the UK you can get your data from Companies as well as government... there are lots of avoidance routes though.
Hey Fist! Not everyone in the media is bad! (hmmmm....well... actually maybe you have a point!)
BBC is better than most. There is a culture of impartiality going back 70 years... amd to a limited extend they do it
I am having real probs viewing this blog...
WoooooooT i had a kick ass 42o..i hope you guys got as fucked up as i did...Come look at my site gus www.freewebs.com/unrealcreeper/
Ya...Unity I have worked as a journalist in the UK too -
The main thing is that the BBC was able to attacking the government relentlessly about Iraq and the misleading tales told by government - Since then Blair has been trying to destroy BBC's independence and independent funding. It is good public service broadcasting.
Blair is a neo con.... like Bush. Rabid Christian who got down on his knees with GB to pray for guidance about Iraq!!! Give me a break
Like Terri's - these freedoms need defending -
Fist said...
"BBC's not shitty, I rely on it a lot"
As I said before, more fool you.
8:52 AM
Out of line Fist... BBC tries like nothing else. Through wars and peace it has kept independence... who do you think IS worth listening to if they aren't? You???
fist likes conservative based news like Fox.
Ahhhhh...how cute! Mommy bought someone a com-put-er!
Anonymous said...
fist likes conservative based news like Fox.
1:27 PM
Anonymous said...
Ahhhhh...how cute! Mommy bought someone a com-put-er!
1:49 PM
I don't think fisto likes any media!
Maybe he does like the sounds of his own.....
*smacks head on table*
was that the sound of fist meeting wood? He must have a point - but can any tell what it is??
I've got one - all from good "media" OK?
" Neoconservatives argued that America has to re-discover its "military strength and moral clarity" and needed to "challenge regimes hostile to our interest and values".
They believe that "American leadership is good for America and good for the world and in that order"
"What is perhaps most remarkable is how early Mr Bush realised the importance of reaching out to Christian conservatives."
"The Shiavo case became important politically because President Bush appealed to his ultra conservative religious base in their attempt to keep Mrs Schiavo alive. "What the United States Congress and what the president of the United States said is, 'This is not right,'"
"You gotta understand, I want to be president, I want to lead,"
but....
At the recent Camp David summit between Tony Blair and President Bush, the news conference was packed and the overflow press corps listened from a big room, British and Europeans separated from their American colleagues by a thin partition.
The Americans shuffled with outraged incomprehension as the Brits howled with laughter at President Bush's verbal infelicities.
Oh and about world progress from a UN conference, under dumb George
The 150-page Beijing declaration stated that women have the right to "decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their sexuality.
The US position at the current meeting reflects President George W Bush's "conservative right" stance against abortion. However, the UN conference's action plan did call for governments not to punish women who have undergone abortions."
"Bush has done his best to ignore and sabotage the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which he refuses to sign. Most Western nations argue the protocal as being vital to the future wellbeing of the planet"
"On Iraq, President Bush has found himself dangerously isolated, save for a few loyal allies.
The belief that the US can go it alone has been shaken by events after the invasion."
"And the visit has an important domestic by-product. Ordinary Americans will have been reassured by their president's return to the world stage. No country likes being hated by the rest of the world."
US police handcuff five-year-old
The officers were caught on camera as they handcuffed the girl
A lawyer has threatened to sue police officers who handcuffed an allegedly uncontrollable five-year-old after she acted up at a Florida kindergarten.
You guys serious - this is Bush land as well??? You want to kill everything, posion everything, buy everything.... leaders of the free world
US has rewrites definition of torture
The US government assertion that the practice has to involve excruciating and agonising pain.
The president has the power to supersede anti-torture laws in wartime.
Could this be why the US has committed more torture in Iraq that any Western Country has in the last 200 years?
George tell us how this is Christian? (well real as opposed to what you beleive).
"Love thy neighbour as thyself" ??? Isn't that it, George.
and why would you want to "protect" Terri when you torture thousands in Iraq and Cuba?
"New claims have surfaced alleging military doctors were asked to participate in acts of torture and humiliation during interrogations at the now notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. The persons before them were both patients and enemies.
One Iraqi woman who, according to Amnesty International, was tortured in Abu Ghraib, said prisoners were often unconscious after interrogation sessions. Two doctors, usually one American and one Iraqi, then examined the prisoners.
On one occasion, it's claimed, a doctor was ordered to insert an intravenous catheter into the corpse of a prisoner killed under interrogation to disguise the cause and time of death.
Yeaaaa George, whoaaa, there's a boy. Defending freedom. So this is what you do to our reputation - this will be remembered for centuries in the Mid East
Terri had difficulty speaking, yes.. Most of us would 'not want to live that way'... until we get to that state and realize that there is still quality of life and opportunities to love and be loved. That's what it's really all about. She was conscious and feeling, and wanted to stay alive.
- See the FORBIDDEN VIDEO that the Managed Media censored from your view:
http://4lifeshaperite.com/rumbles/Conversations_with_Terri.html
She was conscious and in need of therapy, and her mother's comfort. Yet they killed her.
Miss you Terri, I love my vegetables..
:\
"happy 420 everyone"
OK -oldie just found out what that means!
As we're into quotes, get this about our glorious leader.
"Private discussions held by George W Bush before he became president suggest he used marijuana, but would not admit it for fear of setting a bad example.
Mr Bush said that his refusal to answer questions about illegal drugs might cost him the 2000 election.
The conversations were secretly taped by a former aide to Mr Bush's father who has now released part of them."
Mr Bush has spoken frequently about a drink problem in his youth, which ended with an apparent religious awakening at the age of 40, but he has never admitted taking illegal drugs.
On the tape, however, the future president discusses his refusal to answer questions about whether he took marijuana. (and cocaine)
"I wouldn't answer the marijuana question," he says.
"You know why? 'Cause I don't want some little kid doing what I tried."
Oh Lord George, you are such a genius! We all model ourselves on you, didn't you know that...
more
"In response to a remark by Mr Wead that the future president had publicly denied using cocaine, he said, quoted by the New York Times: "I haven't denied anything."
He said that he would continue to refuse to comment on allegations of drug use.
"I am just not going to answer those questions," he said. "And it might cost me the election."
What a bad boy.....
Dee said...
Terri had difficulty speaking, yes..
She was conscious and in need of therapy, and her mother's comfort. Yet they killed her.
7:21 PM
Oh get a life Dee - you must be vegetative to beleive this trash... the best doctors in the land, all the judges, all the experts, and everyone except Christain fundos said she was totally braindead....
NO consciousness,
NO thought,
NO feeling,
NO hope of recovery (after more than 15 years in the same state - with no improvement at all - AT ALL)
How do you think this trash shows all of them to be wrong????
wow. how am i supposed to write a persuasive essay and do a speach on it tomorrow afterschool on euthanasia, and use you as an example if i cant find even two stories that match one another on how things went down for you.
this is frickin stupid. i hate school.
"fist likes conservative based news like Fox."
Ha. I read the New York Review of Books, and to keep me sharp (I don't agree with the politics) leninology.blogspot.com, amongst others.
or is it the other way around?
Anonymous said...
wow. how am i supposed to write a persuasive essay and do a speach on it tomorrow afterschool on euthanasia, and use you as an example if i cant find even two stories that match one another on how things went down for you.
this is frickin stupid. i hate school.
10:52 AM
What do you need for school anon....
What
How do we get unfucked up?
http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
did anyone look at thos - this is not good
Anonymous said...
[The BBC] is an independent body with its own governing body, not answerable to the government. The BBC has openly challenged Blair on the Iraq war for instance... in a way no US media has dared.
I will agree that much of the major, mainstream U.S. media has been shamefully soft on the Bush administration — though I hesitate to generalize, since any body of media has many layers. If you feel that no U.S. media has raised challenges to the Bush administration, perhaps you simply haven’t had access to it. Or perhaps you're only watching television.
Anonymous said...
UK has the Data Protection Act and a Freedom of Information Act - with the same if not greater access to public documents, but while protecting individual privacy.
Legal access to information in the United States is far more extensive than in the U.K. This is due to the First Amendment as well as the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. British libel laws and the British Official Secrets Act, in fact, may inhibit free access to information. I’m not as familiar with your Data Protection Act, but from a cursory overview just now it appears to me that the act also may inhibit, rather than support, access to information. Good journalism certainly can (and does) happen in both environments, but U.S. law is significantly more supportive of someone who is doing investigative journalism. There is simply no question about it.
Anonymous said...
BBC news is more independant, not owned by right wingers, better written and contains mature analysis. The US just has nothing near it. CNN is different again - raw news - but network news in the is risible.
I won’t even begin to defend or discuss television “news” of any kind — American or otherwise. Television news coverage is nearly always cursory and mostly useless. The United States has some world-class print journalism outlets. In Britain, there certainly is a difference between broadsheet newspapers and tabloids.
Anonymous said...
There is also ITN in the UK - commerical news of very high qulaity, andf C$ news which is critical and political - there is simply nothing to match it in the US - which is why the Terri debate has been dominated by right wing interests and can always be so.
The Terri Schiavo case and the congressional action surrounding it actually generated quite an outrage among both Democrats and Republicans in the American public. This absolutely was covered by American newspapers. If your impression is otherwise, or if you're relying only on TV "news," I’d be suspicious of your sources.
Unity said...
1. much of the major, mainstream U.S. media has been shamefully soft on the Bush administration
If you feel that no U.S. media has raised challenges to the Bush administration, perhaps you simply haven’t had access to it. Or perhaps you're only watching television.
Yes but what is the coverage of those two media? Only a small critical voice in the print media has been heard - read by a small minority of the US.
"Legal access to information in the United States is far more extensive than in the U.K. This is due to the First Amendment as well as the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.
Not so. This from the person who didn't know there was an FOI Act in the UK?
British libel laws and the British Official Secrets Act, in fact, may inhibit free access to information.
Nonsense. The Offical Secrets Act is mirrored in the US and elsewhere - national interest etc. Libel Laws have no influence at all on disclosure, but act to ensure that allegations are at least substantial.
"I’m not as familiar with your Data Protection Act, but from a cursory overview just now it appears to me that the act also may inhibit, rather than support, access to information."
On what grounds. That's just nonsence. In principal companies are obliged to disclose and correcr - there is nothing like that in the US. The problem has been that companies have found ways of evading the Law.... especially US ones.
"Good journalism certainly can (and does) happen in both environments, but U.S. law is significantly more supportive of someone who is doing investigative journalism. There is simply no question about it."
That is just utter nationalistic rubbish! Martin Bashire who raised serious question about Michael Jackson for instance is British and made his program under UK jurisdiction.
"I won’t even begin to defend or discuss television “news” of any kind — American or otherwise. Television news coverage is nearly always cursory and mostly useless."
Not the BBC, C4 or ITN in the UK - try watching them.
"The United States has some world-class print journalism outlets...."
and a lot more total junk.
"In Britain, there certainly is a difference between broadsheet newspapers and tabloids."
errr. yes?
"The Terri Schiavo case and the congressional action surrounding it actually generated quite an outrage among both Democrats and Republicans in the American public. This absolutely was covered by American newspapers. If your impression is otherwise, or if you're relying only on TV "news," I’d be suspicious of your sources."
Well - it was simply better covered elsewhere - bit in print and on TV...
your going to hell.
Unity said...
Why do people who put on a reasonable immage always turn out to be the opposite - and worse than the rest???
Good tactics, init
Anonymous said...
Tony Blair for president....
2:25 PM
No way - he's just a better liar than George
Reason and lust can't stay in opposition forever!
Reason and lust can't stay in opposition forever!
Hmmm Unity said America is the land of the free....and those poor Europeans with their 2000 year old culure are really in the dark....
George sure managed to cover his tracks though huh?
Anonymous said...
Reason and lust can't stay in opposition forever!
1:38 PM
I guess not!
Terri Shiavo should still be alive. God decreed that Man has the right to life. Ever read the Bible?
I have faith that God will descend upon us with his wrath and destroy all you heretics. God is Great. He is the Way! Join him or suffer.
God is mercifull, but up to a point. When Jesus hung prostrated on the cross, God said, "No way son, you got yourself into this one. Shed your sorrow like pardons for sin upon Man, then shall the nails jerk free."
Like Jesus, Terri was nailed to a bed, coaxed into false slumber by the sins of nonbelievers. Her death is the making of your doom. While she was fated to suffer silently, your cries of agony will echo through the neverending chambers of Hell. My son's pardon extends so far. To sever the umbilicus to life that kept Terri living is to forfeit his mercy. My mercy mirrors my wrath. May Satan have mercy on your soul.
If this was 30 years ago the Christians would have wanted Terri off the life support. That goes to show you how worthless religion is, it's not real, it's myth believed by idiots. Sorry to break to to you.
I <3 Terri!
err dod = GOD
Yea, gods are for people wo can't accept the real world around them. Sure there is something bigger out there we can't understand, but I assure you it isn't a supreme father figure in the sky shaking his finger at all the little creations that stray from his list of 10 things you aren't supposed to do. haha the bible, what a crock.
If Religion was real, it would be universal across the entire world, this is obviously not the case. The existance of so many religions nullifies the existance of all of them. Religion isn't real kids, your parents lied to you, grow up.
"Religion isn't real kids, your parents lied to you, grow up."
"Yea, gods are for people wo can't accept the real world around them. Sure there is something bigger out there we can't understand,"
"dod is a crutch, and similar to any addictive substance, yea it's all in your head."
These statement must be true. Any religion that beleive it is the only way towahtever - salvation, in this case has to be wron g, and used by the unfit to make themselves feel better.
I think there are more unitive spiritualities rather than religions - that require personal exploration and experience - not just judgement of "lesser religions'' and people that follow them.
Best Christians I ever came across - have been Budhhists.... no judging god in a white robe there... no ranting ministers, sin or other bullshit merchants like George Bush
If this was 30 years ago the Christians would have wanted Terri off the life support.
7:36 PM
That's absolutely right - but don't you know the pope and George say these are absolutely truths.... and they must be right no?
Anonymous said...
"Terri Shiavo should still be alive. God decreed that Man has the right to life. Ever read the Bible?"
Yes, did you??
I have faith that God will descend upon us with his wrath and destroy all you heretics. God is Great. He is the Way! Join him or suffer.
God is mercifull, but up to a point."
I think he will burn you first, moron.
"When Jesus hung prostrated on the cross, God said, "No way son, you got yourself into this one. Shed your sorrow like pardons for sin upon Man, then shall the nails jerk free."
You think that's the bible, right? Oooooo dearrrr......pardon me it's difficult to type laughing this hard....
" Like Jesus, Terri was nailed to a bed, coaxed into false slumber by the sins of nonbelievers. Her death is the making of your doom. While she was fated to suffer silently, your cries of agony will echo through the neverending chambers of Hell."
Which testament is that you read son, (or I suspect, bitch.....)????
"My son's pardon extends so far. To sever the umbilicus to life that kept Terri living is to forfeit his mercy. My mercy mirrors my wrath. May Satan have mercy on your soul."
Holy Cow, you are a satanist....bad bad girl. You are really in the shit no....
Anonymous said...
Unity said...
Why do people who put on a reasonable immage always turn out to be the opposite - and worse than the rest???
Because they think they are more credible getting their own passive agression across?
Nice Blog!
Here is mine:
www.fyionline.blogspot.comc
Nice Blog!
Here is mine:
www.fyionline.blogspot.com
Nice Blog!
Here is mine:
www.fyionline.blogspot.comc
Shit - I did just look
http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
This is what we are doing in Iraq...
LOOK AT THIS.....
Anonymous said...
Fuckin hilarious! alright here's meh 2 cents. USA kicks ass and is doing just fine. pull the plug!
That's less that one cent.... US is the most fucked place in the world - most gun crime, most rapes, most murders, biggest division between rich and poor in G8, most therapists, most child abuse, most infant murders, most polluting, biggest effect on global warming, most wars, worst TV (except Simpsons) least ability to learn about the world, least ability to learn foreign languages, most support for illegal wars (since end of WW2), most illiteracy in G8, poorest public health care in G8, most religous conservatives, least beleive in evolution, and....the two most stupid leaders in world history - Ray Gun, and Thick George
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database/
just found this.... 24,000 Iraqis
and this
SINCE the war was "won" (then why are Americans still dying there)
Iraqi civilian deaths put at 100,000
Tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed in violence since the US-led invasion last year, according to public health experts who estimate there were 100,000 "excess deaths" in 18 months.
The US-based researchers found that the risk of death from violence in the period after the invasion was 58 times higher than before the war.
The rise in the death rate was mainly due to violence and much of it was caused by US air strikes on towns and cities, they said.
"Making conservative assumptions, we think that about 100,000 excess deaths or more have happened since the 2003 invasion of Iraq," said Les Roberts of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in a report published online by The Lancet medical journal.
What the f**k are excess deaths...
I admit it..... America is a f******g mess.
.... and there's no where else to go, cos they hate us out there. Even the British...
Well, we got to make it better here.
check out
www.dontyouhatepants.blogspot.com for equally if not subpar humor!
and we don't want you here
not even as tourists..... and thats all of Europe, not just France
Hey Nazi
Have you got the balls to tell the world who you are? A photo of you blond flowing locks....and stormtrooper looks, redolent of the master race?
I'm on my own? I don't think so...
http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6
Anonymous said...
I'm on my own? I don't think so...
http://www.vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6
9:39 PM
Yup, you and a FEW sick friends....
PS Yes, you will be banged up in any country you might like to live in - 5-7 years in France. Those countries don't want you chum...
Hi Snape
This is about right to life? Not right to death? Why is a Neo Nazi posting all over this? Isn't this sposed to be a bit humourous...?
Anyone who believes someone in Terri Shiavo's condition should be alive has flawed logic. I consider you people dangerous, you believe your insane voice counts which in fact you should either shut up or be shot.
Anonymous said...
Anyone who believes someone in Terri Shiavo's condition should be alive has flawed logic. I consider you people dangerous, you believe your insane voice counts which in fact you should either shut up or be shot.
8:04 AM
Yup... problem is most people here think she should have been alowed to die with dignity (apart from afew crazies...)
The Jews have degraded society through their inventions, it's YOUR problem that you're too blind to see it, not mine.
You are logically flawed, you do not SEE it, you do not see how they are destroying your country. How does this indicate a problem with myself? You are the one with the problem.
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
You're eerily on the mark there, are you taunting me Jew? I know how to reverse this pollution, people will gain wind of what you've done when I share it with the world and they will want blood.
Anonymous Nazi said...
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
You're eerily on the mark there, are you taunting me Jew? I know how to reverse this pollution, people will gain wind of what you've done when I share it with the world and they will want blood.
11:39 AM
You for real? Mad as a fucking hatter....
"Their inventions.... polluting your bodily fluids no doubt.... "
Actually looser, that is a famous quote from a film.... Dr Strangelove. It's above a mad bastard who thinks communists have polluted his bodily fluids and tries to annhilate the world...!!!
Your are a sandwich or two short of picnic..
I also thing you are having a feud here with a non existant fantasy Jew - anonymous can mean many people - get the idea??!
ha ha ha!
The biggest online wacko yet!
OOOOHHHH, the Jews are polluting my body fluids.... save me save me
What the wazz is going on here $^&^(*^(
Is this therapy...?!$%886kdjr
wowsa... am I a jew too?
Terri
Ar e the Nazi's up there. Tell me babe?
This is the best blog ever.
--X
Well, let's say this guy has built a different view of the world.
I say he has a chance to come to some really better views....
Better views? You mean the average views that have turned this planet into the sewer that it is? No thanks, i'll stick to my own superior beliefs and ultimately force them on others.
Time to move on.... superior? Very lonely place hating everything? Is that really what you want for all time?
Oh - and force them on others?
You know you need to find a place to be - and do something good. Notjing lasting was ever forced on anyone.... that is a lesson of history
Religion?
hmmm - how has that really lasted when people didn't have to go to Church.... even the mad bible belt types often go there form social pressure.
oh no, I'm going to be in the hot plaice....
Right on...Heaven as a perpetual, ongoing, eternal bong hit...wow...maybe not clearly "biblical" but I bet its true!
(big smile) the post-death posts are hilarious and very coooool, too!
I think heaven, (or whatever) is probably like being bonged without the bong!
Terri you may find this site helpful:
http://www.elderlycarecenter.org/
Anonymous said...
To me heaven is a place without Jews.
7:08 PM
Well that's easy - just stay in your cell
Anonymous said...
To me heaven is a place without Jews.
7:08 PM
.... and to everyone else it is a place without you
Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day.
So Nazi
If you say anything esle stupid here I will come and get ya....
Oh you're going to 'get me'? Hahaha. I always laugh at gangsters who try to intimidate others over the internet with rl threats. I'd speak all of this to someone's face, I fear nothing.
National Socialism will come back, it's only a matter of time before people get tired of the Jews again. They may be more discrete in their mischief but they aren't fooling everyone.
no, I don't think so. Today is the aniversary of Hitler's death give or take a day or two... that was the end of it for all time.
Oh and by the way -if you are sooo brave - publish your contact details or clam up coward....
Hey Unity, About Amarican mainstream media --- "Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying ... is considered career suicide."
-- Carl Cameron, as quoted in The Spies Who Came In From The Art Sale
"While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk."
-- Unnamed reporter as quoted in American Media Censorship and Israel
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
-- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . .
I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel.
We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."
-- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. --- read more at www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html
These phrases, "hate speech" and "anti-Semite", are well-worn devices to shut up a critic of Israel without having to answer the criticisms. Indeed they have been used so much that they have become red warning flags that the person using those phrases has something to hide and needs to shut down the discussion by any means possible. By screaming "hate speech" or "anti-Semite", Israel's supporters hope to shut down the debate without actually examining the issues involved.
The truth is "hate speech" only
to those who have something to hide
www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html MORE PEOPLE READ www.whatreallyhappened.com/ THAN READ NEWSWEEK.COM OR the US Government's CitizenCorp! http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=640&h=480&r=1y&y=r&u=whatreallyhappened.com/&u= http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379&h=216&r=6m&y=r&u=newsweek.com/&u=
"hate speech" and "anti-Semite",
"are well-worn devices to shut up a critic of Israel without having to answer the criticisms"
errrrr..... no.
Criticise Israel fine - think genocide and mass murder is OK - not fine.
See the difference, sad boy?
"No - Nazism will return and gloriously cleanse the world of impurity sickness and racial error. We will kill all of the untermensch..." and that mean you.... blog reading vermin.
"I will be the new super leader of the master race, the arians - and from this blog comments section, march to glory with the seried legions of the New Blog Order".
"I am superior in mind body and thought to all of you! I write more comments on this blog than any other human in existance. You are all inferior to me.
I have access to the real truth web sites which you, the normal lesser people cannot find or assimilate.
"Others must adhere to my beliefs, not the other way around."
Resistance is useless! The blog National Socalist Hoard will achieve world dominance in 5 months from the date of this post, starting by taking over the comments columns of this blog and any others where anyone dares to oppose the new Reich.... and irrespective of the ignorance of the purpose of that blog or the inferiority of the readers of that blog.
Then I will come out of my bedroom and see if Mommy has made the warm milk.
"Anonymous said...
HA ~ proof once again, Maury or Sol or whatever your name"
4:51 PM
Hey thats real unaccny - how did you know? my name is Maury Sol Ratzinger....
Are we related? I'm catholic? You?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/hitlerdeath.html
found something you will love....
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-12-26-nazi-hunters_x.htm
or this!
Nazi chasers will also hunt modern-day monsters
By Peter Eisler, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department's Nazi hunters, still busy as ever, are about to get a new class of bad guys to chase.
The intelligence overhaul law signed Dec. 17 by President Bush includes a provision that directs the department's Office of Special Investigations (OSI) to root out all manner of war criminals and human rights abusers who try to settle in the USA.
OYE VEY ! lol, Maury now has to resort to sarcasm. READERS check out www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html and decide for yourself. btw, www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html is not an opnion site, it uses all your much valued Israeli controlled mainstream medias and government reports as resources with links to the orginals stories as posted on the mainstream media sites. So READERS, GET THE FACTS www.whatreallyhappened.com/olderarticles.html
or this - surely you can't be a Nazi if some of them are jews!
Israeli soldier arrested for neo-Nazi ties
Jamie Cortazzo at 3:23 PM
[JURIST] A Russian immigrant turned Israeli soldier was arrested in Israel for ties to neo-Nazi groups Thursday just as Israel was marking Holocaust Remambrance Day [bakgrounder] on the 60th anniversary of Nazi Germany's defeat. The soldier had been arrested on drug charges, but under interrogation told police he was a Nazi, which led to the discovery of correspondence with neo-Nazi groups on the soldier's computer and a swastika tattoo on his arm. Israel was founded as a safe haven for Jews after World War II and has accepted a multitude of Russian Jewish immigrants.
Anonymous Nazi said...
OYE VEY ! lol, Maury now has to resort to sarcasm. READERS check out
You got your milk son? Nazi - you don't have readers! No audience, no sympathisers, no friends, no followers,
I bet you are jewish somewhere going back.... or maybe your mother....
OK OK - we shouldn't take the piss out of you (there would be nothing left....)
Naaaa.... ok we should.
http://www.netflix.com/MovieDisplay?movieid=70019891&mqso=60186664&trkid=129129
This will get your little Nazi pulse racing....
Unsolved History: Hunting Nazis
or a little backgound reading about some of you insane buddies
Neo Nazis
Information on the subject from the Ross Institute for the Study of Destructive
Cults, Groups and Movements.
www.rickross.com/groups/neonazis.html
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,59662,00.html?tw=wn_story_related
French neo-Nazis formed an alliance with extremist Jewish groups on the Internet to publish a torrent of hate messages directed against Arabs and Muslims, according to a report by a leading anti-racist group.
The report said 26 websites, traced to right-wing and Jewish extremists groups in France, operated from the same server in the United States between 1999 and March this year.
Members of the groups also shared advice on how to send messages without leaving electronic trails.
Boy are you guys easily confused....
You need some new material boy, all that Maury hating stuff a bit dull
http://judaism.about.com/library/3_lifecycles/names/bl_names.htm
Hebrew Names
Naming a Jewish BabyFind a Hebrew Name: Hebrew Names for Boys
http://www.jromances.com/?tid=122
in case you are capable of relationship
JRomances is dedicated to bringing Jewish friends and singles together by offering valuable services to all of our Jewish singles and friends in your city and around the world.
Brit Milah favors & gift
Personalized kipot, maps, benchers, watches, tallitot for your simcha.
www.a-zara.com
http://www.skinheads.net/forums/index.php?
Yea -this is probably more for you... photos toooooo. You lucky lucky Nazi
oh Nazi - that the NO 1 site for online aggro!!
I have better things to do than joke around, don't try to discredit me by pretending you're me, that's just pathetic.
Gord Lord!
Reading through your posts here - and there are many - you are an uneducated, misguided person of little merit, and great personal insecurity.
You have won no arguements, made no worthy points and merely embarassed yourself with historical inaccuracy, ranting and offensivenes. Because you refuse to listen to some quite sensible things that have been written to you, means only that - that you are too confused to listen.
You claim, "a much higher level intelligence than any one of you, you LOSE."
These are the words of a schizophrenic. Pure and simple.
That you don't realise it, is really only tour problem. From what I can see everyone else has quite clearly established a proper opinion of you and your material
Anonymous Nazi said...
"I'm now accused of being Jewish? This is comical!"
Do yo know - I think it may just be true! You looser!
"It's funny you would assign a Jewish identity to me when you seem to care so much about the Jews. The Jews did the same to Adolf Hitler, spreading false propoganda that he had Jewish roots, absolutely pathetic."
Oh yea - poor old Hitler, so misunderstood.
"Try again you mental defects, like many before you, you are unable to win an argument against me."
Now that really is funny.... loooooooser !!
"This 'Nazi lunatic' has thus proven to hold a much higher level intelligence than any one of you, you LOSE."
Jesus wept! You are a total moron! Brainless, stupid, misled, misguded, deluded....Nazi.
What is it exactly you have won???? What great goad have you achieved!!!!
Yep - that is piss funny
It is evident from what you write that you are incapable of winning an argument against me. You're usage of the word 'LOOOSER' just further proves my point. I stand on a higher ground than the rest of you worthless sheep, this is a fact, tossing cheap, juvenile posts against me doesn't change this fact. I continue to win arguments against those that have been brainwashed by the Jew, I have experienced more of their heinous acts than anyone here can claim. Ignorance is a poison, drop it or perish.
of all the people on the internet, i have met only few who can take hits, and deliver with a vengence... steak, kudos to u man, bcause if anyone pins u down, he or she has to be damn good.
streak, keep up that funny ass comments. fun to read
Nazi isn't even a real term, it's a word the enemies of National Socialism use. I was not born in Germany and thus do not know German so I don't know what your point is. You have no grounds by which you can claim that I am not a National Socialist.
so, how bout that jeff gordon ? think he'll win the cup ? personally i'm cheering on ken schrader :)~
uhhh
--- nascar ---
Anonymous said...
of all the people on the internet, i have met only few who can take hits, and deliver with a vengence... steak, kudos to u man, bcause if anyone pins u down, he or she has to be damn good.
streak, keep up that funny ass comments. fun to read
9:29 PM
The guy is toooo sick to notice how out on a limb he is...
"Anonymous said...
Nazi isn't even a real term, it's a word the enemies of National Socialism use."
Bollocks - you don't even know the origins of that word... ???
"I was not born in Germany and thus do not know German so I don't know what your point is."
His/her point is that you are a fraud. A saddo sitting in his bedroom making up crap on your own - it's why you have nothing to say. It's just like masturbation, you do it on your own - and gets you a bit of attention - even if that is just people laughing at you.... that's real sad.
"You have no grounds by which you can claim that I am not a National Socialist.
I think you are wrong...
you have been exposed - and cleverly. You know nothing about it... all you do is make a few stupid comments any 14 year old could make.
The guy is toooo sick to notice how out on a limb he is...
Sorry streak - That was for the Nazi - NOT the Streak....
You guys are using the same old juvenile rebuttals I am used to from many previous sites, absolutely pathetic. You aren't going to win this argument no matter how hard you try, it's sad that you've even sunk low enough to claim I am Jewish and not a Nazi, this is absolutely hilarious to me. You're just upset that someone is out there that isn't going to take the shit of the world with open arms, are you one of those Jewish pigs who have ruined this country? Wouldn't suprise me in the least bit. Change your attitudes or perish.
Anonymous Nazi (jewish nazi!) for the last time... sais!!!)
"You guys are using the same old juvenile rebuttals I am used to from many previous sites,"
Oh Lord - Nazi spends his whole dismal life doing this.....
"You people need to learn when you've lost an argument and when someone holds a higher level of intellect over you, making your viewpoints worthless."
Oh yes, indeed! Your staggering arguments here have made the quality of your intellect realy really clear... no doubt about it... at all.
Good riddance creep
Awesome! Check out my blog, Adobe Photoshop Tutorials
The Nazi does make a point, this place is crawling with immature kids.
yes indeed.... but at least immature kids may grow up.... I fear for that guy...
ain't it quiet without the fascists!!!
Yea, Terri has dealt with the facists - they are in the hot place now....
Terri would have made a great lawn gnome
yall are all so screwd up...FIST that is rude..im doin a report over teri for skool if u knew wat she went through u wouldnt be makin stupied remarks u just may get wat u want
Hi
Canyoning Pictures in :
http://kogoulcanyon.blogspot.com
weird but creative
- pinoy forum
You loser, how on earth could you be so insensitive. She was a human being just like you and I, and had the right to live just like the rest of us. Putting words in the mouths of the dead is just wrong... She was only put to death because she was suffering and not just because it was her choice... At least she is not suffering anymore... How would you like it if you were in that condition and someone had the idea to do this to you. Think on that!
Think on that!
uggggggg.... thinking on that has been what folks have been doing here retard
Anonymous said...
Think on that!
uggggggg.... thinking on that, has been what folks have been doing here retard
4:07 PM
Why are all the Christian conscience types so vile? Isn't the idea that Christioans live kind, nice lives?????
im glad shes dead. hahaha\
well yea - she out of harms way -especially those creeps of parent so fhers and all the appalling fundo Christians who thought they would stick thier oar into her life...
..... because of cause they know best -
fuk let get high too
http://informedsources.blogspot.com/2005/05/dean-wastes-no-time-in-charting-dems.html
Howard Dean's plans for Terri.
ISRAILI spec forces are like... dude!!!! they lopped almost the whole barrel off of an M16 varient, causing lack of pressure biuld up to cycle the next round which causes jamming, massive muzzel flash and singed eyebrows (for non gun-nuts, that means they cut up a rifle, just so they could fit 40 of them in the boot of a mini and shoot their thumbs off by accident)
soz, that was uber random of me..
ooh I saw something about this on the news, but I'd better not get too involved with anything to do with ethics or oppinion because theres a chance I'l make an arse of myself, although I may have already.
but thats not the point, the point is, any israili spec forces operative, however incorrectly spelt his title is or how many of his thumbs he has shot off, can still take down any of the immoral muppets here, using only his eyebrows.
Where's Wally?? Is he colour enhanced, where did they put his red and white jumper, i want one. I want a chocolate covered pencil case so that i can fly to the moon and see my dad with the dolphins, while scratching a telephone pole against a blackboard.
Ahhh, let's sing it:
Four and Twenty years ago
I come into this life,
Son of a woman
And a man who lived in strife.
He was tired of being poor
But he wasn't into selling door to door
And he worked like a devil to be more.
A different kind of poverty now upsets me so
Night after sleepless night
I walk the floor and want to know
Why am I so alone?
Where is my woman, can I bring her home?
Have I driven her away?
Is she gone?
Morning comes the sunrise,
And I'm driven to my bed
I see that it is empty
And there's devils in my head.
I embrace the many colored beast.
I grow weary of the torment
Can there be no peace?
And I find myself just wishing that my life would simply cease.
Ahh......
9/11 WAS A HOAX AND BUSH WAS BEHIND IT. HOW CAN BUSH CARE SO MUCH ABOUT TERRI SCHIAVO WHEN HE KILLED 3000 PEOPLE ON 9/11????
BUSH CAUSED 9/11 TO HIGHTEN HIS POPULARITY AND TO DESTROY ALL ARAB/MUSLIM NATIONS THAT DON'T LIKE ISRAEL. HE WANTS JESUS TO RETURN TO EARTH AND THAT'S WHY HE WANTS TO TAKE OVER AND SET UP ISRAELI-FRIENDLY PUPPETT GOVERNMENTS IN THESE NATIONS. THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS IT:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529813972926262623&q=great+conspiracy&hl=en
Don't tell me this is a dead topic?
Sean Hannity talked about two people facing death in the last few years. One was going to be a drain on society, the other most likely would give a great deal back to the greater good. Sean Hannity spared no energy to save one of them, and lobbied hard for the death of the other.
Want a hint of which one Mr. Hannity chose?
It wasn't Tookie Williams.
best cool site
http://www.celebritiescelebs.org
Terri Schiavo Lyrics
Ugh ugh
All you Terri fans throw your hands up
What?!
Cherry licker
Nipple sucker
Schlong licker
I used to know a bitch named Terri Schiavo
She used to love chicken wings and thai ropes
Now she's confined to a bed
And her eyes are always in the back of her head
I know a guy named Reggie who's compared her to a veggie
Her ass is so big she can't pull out her own wedgie
The lack of dimples makes you look kind of edgy
The way she bends her neck back, man, she looks sexy
Ugh
Nananana
Sounds Terri making
Aaaaaa waaaaaa
A-na-na-na
Eeee-na-ee-na-ee-na
Baaa baaa
Get on your knees bitch
Suck my dick
If you prefer you can call it an oversized clit
Terri suck my balls
Terri suck my balls
But she drools everywhere
And choke on a pubic hair
Now it's time sing about little -what?
Dig it -- I mean nip
For more go to: www.myspace.com/terriandtheschiavos1
That was really great Jokes and quotes at www.shugle.com
Funny, Jokes, Αστεία ανέκδοτα, Αστείες φωτογραφίες, Online games, Free games, Free sms, Free poker, Online Chat.
Very nice effect, and great tutorials thanks for sharing.
Thanks for sharing with us ...
story
Post a Comment
<< Home